IFCCI
参考编号: CMP008

Tickmill

文档已发布执行问题

Tickmill

Stop-loss triggered at off-market price

参考编号: CMP008事件日期: 2025-05-14提交日期: 2025-05-20最后更新: 2025-07-28

描述

A stop-loss order on GBP/USD was triggered at 1.2580 during a period when no other major broker showed a price below 1.2595. The complainant provides execution logs and price comparisons from three other platforms showing the price spike was isolated to Tickmill. The resulting loss was USD 780. The complainant requested a trade adjustment which was denied by Tickmill's dealing desk.

涉及金额

USD 780

支持证据

  • tickmill-execution-log.pdf
  • competitor-price-comparison.png
  • trade-adjustment-denial-email.pdf

投诉时间线

投诉已提交

2025-05-20

初步审查中

2025-05-20

等待支持证据

2025-05-20

研究审查中

2025-05-20

已请求平台回复

2025-05-20

文档已发布当前状态

2025-07-28

案例已关闭

平台回复

已验证回复争议回复

Response to CFD Price Deviation Complaint

回复人: Avi Goldstein|Legal & Compliance Department

Plus500 disputes the characterization of the price difference as a 'deviation.' CFD prices during extended market hours are derived from available liquidity and may not precisely match the underlying asset's last traded price on the primary exchange. This is clearly disclosed in our Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Risk Disclosure. The prices offered were fair and reflective of available market liquidity at the time. We maintain that no mispricing occurred.

2026-02-282026-03-02
IFCCI Note

IPTI notes that while CFD pricing divergence during extended hours is industry-standard, the degree of deviation in this case is under further review. Platform's PDS does disclose this risk. Case remains open pending data analysis completion.

IFCCI研究回复

Research Commentary
2025-07-28
分析师: IPTI Research Unit A
|
RU-MY-001

IFCCI's comparative price analysis confirms that the GBP/USD price level of 1.2580 was not reflected on major liquidity providers' feeds during the specified time window. This suggests a possible liquidity gap or anomalous price tick on Tickmill's feed. While isolated price spikes can occur legitimately in ECN environments, the platform's refusal to review the trade against independent price data raises transparency questions. Research observations indicate that platforms adopt clearer off-market price review policies.

回复类型: Research Commentary

Legal Disclaimer

The IFCCI Transparency Programme is an independent research initiative and does not constitute regulatory supervision, professional financial advice, or official compliance certification. All findings represent research-based observations intended to contribute to financial industry transparency discourse and informed evaluation. FinScope is a technology platform developed to support the programme’s public-facing digital interface.