IFCCI

Transaction Costs

Deal Analysis Case Study

3 min bacaanPelajaran 10 dari 10
100%

Objektif Pembelajaran

  1. 1Conduct a complete deal analysis from market research through negotiation to return calculation
  2. 2Build a comprehensive transaction cost budget for a Malaysian property purchase
  3. 3Calculate gross yield, net yield, and cash-on-cash return for a rental investment
  4. 4Evaluate a deal's strengths and weaknesses to make an informed investment decision

Putting It All Together

Throughout this level, you have learned about finding deals, negotiating, and understanding transaction costs. Now let us walk through a complete deal analysis from start to finish, combining everything into a real-world case study.

The Property

Location: 3-bedroom condo in Ara Damansara, Petaling Jaya
Asking price: RM 520,000
Built-up area: 1,100 sq ft
Title: Strata, leasehold (75 years remaining)
Condition: Partially furnished, needs minor renovation
Days on market: 85 days

Step 1: Market Research

You research comparable sales and find:

  • Similar unit (1,100 sq ft) sold 2 months ago: RM 490,000
  • Similar unit (1,050 sq ft) sold 3 months ago: RM 475,000
  • Similar unit (1,150 sq ft) currently listed: RM 510,000

Estimated market value: RM 480,000 - RM 500,000
The asking price of RM 520,000 is above market value.

Step 2: Negotiation

Armed with your comparable data and noting the property has been listed for 85 days:

  • Your opening offer: RM 460,000 (with comparable data attached)
  • Seller counters: RM 500,000
  • You counter: RM 475,000 with furnishings included
  • Seller accepts: RM 475,000 with all existing furniture

You negotiated RM 45,000 (8.6%) off the asking price and got free furnishings worth approximately RM 15,000.

Step 3: Transaction Cost Budget

ItemAmount (RM)
Earnest deposit (3%)14,250
Balance deposit (7%)33,250
SPA stamp duty8,500
SPA legal fees + disbursements5,500
Loan stamp duty (0.5% of RM 427,500)2,138
Loan legal fees + disbursements5,000
Valuation fee1,200
Minor renovation budget8,000
Total cash neededRM 77,838

Step 4: Rental Income Projection

Comparable rental listings in the building show RM 1,800 - RM 2,200/month for similar units.

With the included furnishings and minor renovation, you target RM 2,100/month.

Income/ExpenseMonthly (RM)Annual (RM)
Gross rental income2,10025,200
Less: Maintenance fee-330-3,960
Less: Sinking fund-33-396
Less: Quit rent + assessment--500
Less: Insurance--400
Less: Repairs (5% of rent)-105-1,260
Less: Vacancy (1 month)--2,100
Net rental income-RM 16,584

Step 5: Return Analysis

MetricCalculationResult
Gross rental yieldRM 25,200 / RM 475,0005.3%
Net rental yieldRM 16,584 / RM 475,0003.5%
Net yield on total costRM 16,584 / RM 505,3383.3%
Cash-on-cash returnRM 16,584 / RM 77,83821.3%

The net yield of 3.5% is moderate, but the cash-on-cash return of 21.3% is strong because you are using leverage (only RM 77,838 of your own money to control a RM 475,000 asset).

Step 6: The Verdict

Pros:

  • Bought below market value (RM 475,000 vs. RM 490,000 fair value)
  • Free furnishings save RM 15,000
  • Solid cash-on-cash return of 21.3%
  • Good rental demand area near LRT and commercial hub

Cons:

  • Leasehold with 75 years remaining (affects long-term value)
  • Net yield of 3.5% is moderate
  • RM 77,838 cash outlay is significant

Decision: Proceed with the investment. The below-market purchase price, strong rental demand, and high cash-on-cash return make this a solid deal despite the moderate net yield.

Poin Utama

  1. 1A complete deal analysis combines market research (comparable sales), negotiation (offer strategy), transaction cost budgeting, rental projections, and return calculations
  2. 2For a RM 475,000 condo with 90% financing, total cash needed including deposit, fees, and renovation was approximately RM 78,000
  3. 3Cash-on-cash return (21.3%) is often more meaningful than net yield (3.5%) for leveraged investments because it measures return on your actual cash invested
  4. 4The final investment decision weighs both quantitative factors (yields, cash flow) and qualitative factors (location, lease type, demand drivers)

Knowledge Check

1. In the case study, the cash-on-cash return was 21.3% while the net rental yield was only 3.5%. What explains this large difference?